by Wolf Linder, Bern*
(20 March 2026) Voters will soon have to decide on the neutrality initiative: Should neutrality be enshrined in the Constitution? Should Switzerland support economic sanctions? Should peace efforts be strengthened? Does Switzerland want more neutrality or more NATO? Or should everything stay the same?
by Guy Mettan*, Geneva
(6 March 2026) As the war in Ukraine drags on, a small diplomatic window seems to be opening. With its tradition of neutrality and mediation, Switzerland could seize this opportunity to build on its historical role and contribute to reviving the momentum for peace.
by Dr Sabine Vuilleumier-Koch*
(6 March 2026) While Switzerland’s “Federal Office of Public Health” (FOPH) continues to claim that the available mRNA vaccines are “safe and well tolerated”, lawyers and doctors are joining forces with National Councillor Rémy Wyssmann to call for a “moratorium on modRNA vaccines”.1 Alarming scientific findings justify this. Facts, the legal situation and political demands were presented on 23 February 2026 at a media conference held by the “Aktionsbündnis freie Schweiz” (ABF Switzerland) in Bern. – This can be viewed in full.2
by Dr. phil. René Roca, Research Institute for Direct Democracy*
(6 March 2026) In the debate surrounding Swiss neutrality, there are repeated calls for Switzerland, i.e. the Federal Council and Parliament, to morally condemn aggressors and violations of international law.
by Thomas Scherr*
(20 February 2026) In unstable times, it is particularly important to reflect on one’s own strengths. Switzerland is known for its direct democracy. This includes solid support for political actiosn, established neutrality in a diverse and divergent world, and finally, acting in accordance with the principle of “good faith”.
by Michael Straumann*
(13 February 2026) (CH-S) A popular initiative aims to significantly reduce the compulsory contributions to the “Swiss Broadcasting Corporation” (SBC). Every Swiss household must pay these fees, regardless of whether they use its services or not. The SBC is known for its political bias. Could a significant reduction in contributions motivate those responsible to strike a better balance in political and cultural issues?
In the following article, Michael Straumann examines the arguments put forward by the SBC phalanx.